Home Stampa estera Washington Post: perché Hitler non usò i gas fuori dai lager?

Washington Post: perché Hitler non usò i gas fuori dai lager?

Adolf Hitler gassed and killed 6 million Jews during World War II — a genocide that makes his reluctance to use sarin against his military adversaries an enduring mystery.
di Michael S. Rosenwald dal  dell’11 aprile 2017
It wasn’t because he was less evil than Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, despite White House press secretary Sean Spicer’s tone-deaf statement Tuesday that “someone as despicable as Hitler” didn’t use chemical weapons the way Assad did.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer on April 11 said Adolf Hitler didn’t use chemical weapons during World War II. Hitler’s regime exterminated millions of Jews in gas chambers. (Reuters)

And it wasn’t because Hitler didn’t have sarin. A German scientist had stumbled onto the nerve agent while experimenting with compounds in an attempt to kill beetles. The German military built a sarin factory in 1943. Officers pleaded with Hitler to use it.

He didn’t.
Over the years, historians (armchair and scholarly) and psychologists have speculated that maybe Hitler didn’t use sarin because he was a victim of a mustard gas attack in 1918, during World War I, and knew the misery of such weapons.
“He and several comrades, retreating from their dug-out during a gas attack, were partially blinded by the gas and found their way to safety only by clinging on to each other and following a comrade who was slightly less badly afflicted,” Ian Kershaw wrote in his critically acclaimed Hitler biography.
Hitler described the blindness in his 1925 autobiography, “Mein Kampf.”
“Towards morning,” Hitler wrote, “I also began to feel pain. It increased with every quarter of an hour, and about seven o’clock my eyes were scorching.… A few hours later my eyes were like glowing coals, and all was darkness around me.”
Hitler was taken to a hospital, where he eventually recovered and learned that Germany had been defeated. The world knows what happened next.
But there’s not much, if any, historical evidence to suggest that Hitler vetoed sarin because of his mustard gas experience.
But there is a wealth of historical record about Hitler’s archenemy in World War II: Winston Churchill.
Churchill embraced the use of chemical weapons during World War I.

“I cannot understand this squeamishness about the use of gas,” the future British prime minister wrote in a 1919 memo. “It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.”

If Hitler used sarin on the battlefield, Churchill likely would have retaliated with his own chemical weapons.
War is chess. Hitler would have sacrificed a lot of pieces that he couldn’t afford to lose.
He never made that move.

- Advertisment -

Articoli popolari

PCI 1921-’21. Perché non abbiamo bisogno di una Norimberga per il Comunismo

Cento anni fa nasceva il Partito Comunista Italiano. Lo ricordano non tantissimi, e fra questi soprattutto i nostalgici (pochi) e gli...

Ufo, la Cia svela migliaia di dossier governativi

di Roberto Vivaldelli - da Il Giornale del 15/01/2021 Migliaia di documenti declassificati della Cia sui cosiddetti Ufo - oggetti...

Fake news prima dell’era social: la stampa e la Guerra del Golfo del ’91

Il 17 gennaio 1991 scattava l'operazione militare "Tempesta nel Deserto" la più grande operazione militare Usa dalla Seconda guerra mondiale. Proprio il 17 gennaio...

Ecco l”ultimo “crimine” del generale Patton

da Barbadillo.it - del 18 marzo 2015 Vorrei denunciare un recente crimine di guerra, ancora una volta a...