Home Stampa estera Washington Post: perché Hitler non usò i gas fuori dai lager?

Washington Post: perché Hitler non usò i gas fuori dai lager?

Adolf Hitler gassed and killed 6 million Jews during World War II — a genocide that makes his reluctance to use sarin against his military adversaries an enduring mystery.
di Michael S. Rosenwald dal  dell’11 aprile 2017
It wasn’t because he was less evil than Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, despite White House press secretary Sean Spicer’s tone-deaf statement Tuesday that “someone as despicable as Hitler” didn’t use chemical weapons the way Assad did.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer on April 11 said Adolf Hitler didn’t use chemical weapons during World War II. Hitler’s regime exterminated millions of Jews in gas chambers. (Reuters)

And it wasn’t because Hitler didn’t have sarin. A German scientist had stumbled onto the nerve agent while experimenting with compounds in an attempt to kill beetles. The German military built a sarin factory in 1943. Officers pleaded with Hitler to use it.

He didn’t.
Why?
Over the years, historians (armchair and scholarly) and psychologists have speculated that maybe Hitler didn’t use sarin because he was a victim of a mustard gas attack in 1918, during World War I, and knew the misery of such weapons.
“He and several comrades, retreating from their dug-out during a gas attack, were partially blinded by the gas and found their way to safety only by clinging on to each other and following a comrade who was slightly less badly afflicted,” Ian Kershaw wrote in his critically acclaimed Hitler biography.
Hitler described the blindness in his 1925 autobiography, “Mein Kampf.”
“Towards morning,” Hitler wrote, “I also began to feel pain. It increased with every quarter of an hour, and about seven o’clock my eyes were scorching.… A few hours later my eyes were like glowing coals, and all was darkness around me.”
Hitler was taken to a hospital, where he eventually recovered and learned that Germany had been defeated. The world knows what happened next.
But there’s not much, if any, historical evidence to suggest that Hitler vetoed sarin because of his mustard gas experience.
But there is a wealth of historical record about Hitler’s archenemy in World War II: Winston Churchill.
Churchill embraced the use of chemical weapons during World War I.

“I cannot understand this squeamishness about the use of gas,” the future British prime minister wrote in a 1919 memo. “It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.”

If Hitler used sarin on the battlefield, Churchill likely would have retaliated with his own chemical weapons.
War is chess. Hitler would have sacrificed a lot of pieces that he couldn’t afford to lose.
He never made that move.

- Advertisment -

Articoli popolari

Dittatura digitale: ecco come ci stiamo consegnando al mondo delle macchine (e a chi le controlla)

“I mass media soffocano la diversità. Tutto viene a scarseggiare, tranne i dieci libri, i dieci dischi più venduti, i film...

Chiese distrutte tra Francia, Belgio, Inghilterra e Cile

Nel giugno 2020 i lavori di riqualificazione di un collegio universitario a Lille, Alta Francia, raggiungevano oltralpe rilevanza nazionale: oggetto del...

Genocidio armeno: forum a cura di “Arsenale delle idee”, in diretta FB, lunedì 12 ore 19

Lunedì 12 aprile 2021, alle ore 19.00 sulla pagina Fb dell’ Arsenale delle idee il forum: “Armeni: il genocidio negato” a partire dal...

Armeni, il genocidio negato, su Storia in Rete n. 180, aprile 2021

Centinaia di migliaia di morti, forse quasi un milione e mezzo. Un'intera civiltà cancellata dalle terre dove viveva da tremila anni....